Tips for estate agents looking to take better photos

16 February 2010

West Midlands photographer Peter Lincoln is our guest blogger today, with some tips on improving the quality of your photos. Peter has a varied portfolio including commercial, portraiture and wedding work.

"As estate agents you should see your photographs as an extension of your professional arsenal. Invest a little time and money on some training and some good quality equipment. All too often I see the camera thrust upon the 'artistic' member of staff or worse in the hands of the chain smoker who likes to be out of the office as much as possible.

Good photographs are powerful things, they can inspire emotion, passion and desire. But a bad photograph can do the opposite almost instantaneously. Take a look at the photographs you are providing and take a look at what your competition are offering. The common mistake is to settle for photographs that are 'just as good', don't; be better, be the best in your area.

I have outlined a few tips which you can use to ensure your photographs show your properties in their best light.

Wherever possible shoot the house on a clear sunny day. If you need to make a repeat visit then so be it. Mid morning or mid afternoon is the best time. Avoid the sun when its too high in the sky but, at the same time, sunsets can cast deep shadows across gardens. Avoid these shadows and, if you can, shoot with the sun behind you - it will give a smooth even exposure.

When shooting inside use as much natural light as possible. This will give a soft warm image. It may be necessary to use the flash to fill in the darker areas. All cameras will have the option to force the flash on and off - try taking one with flash and one without and see which looks best.

Frame the image. It does not have to be picture perfect but this example just shows a lazy slap dash approach.

In truth this is an awful photograph. The fence and tree are obscuring the view and the house is wonky. Just a few seconds more effort could have resolved this. I would have gone a little wider and stood about 5 feet to the right, then cropped the image off to show the fence but not overpower the image with it. I would also have used the tree to frame the image on the left hand side.

Dress the scene - take a few minutes to tidy up. For external shots move cars, wheelie bins and arrange garden furniture to make the area look tidy and desirable. For internal shots work with what you have. If the house is empty, shoot from a slightly lower angle from the very corner of the room. If the room is in use arrange tables, chairs and other furniture to make it look homely and inviting.

This photograph is lazy, a little bit of effort to move the sign and the rubbish bags would have lifted the whole scene.

Take a look at this bedroom. At first glass it looks fine, but on closer inspection you will see a few flaws. Try switching lights and lamps on. Does it look more pleasing with the extra light? Even with the patio door the room looks cramped. A wider angle lens would show off the entire room. Most vitally is to square off properly. The more you look at it the more uneven it appears. The leading edge of the wardrobe should be vertical, as it is it looks like its falling off to the right.


This is a much better example. The room looks big and clean, the lamps give warmth and a sense of comfort and though the room is in use it gives the sense of a blank canvas that a new owner to put their personal touch onto.

Be sure to cover all the bases. If a property as a particular feature like a conservatory or garage, make sure its included. Most importantly of all, be honest We all know its your job to sell houses, but be truthful. Photographs like these 'powerstation photos' will not do you any favours. If the house is next to a power station, be sure to show it!"

Peter Lincoln
http://www.devotionphotography.co.uk/

Leave your comment:



What you said:

19 February 2010 10:39:13
The very best tip for an estate agent who wants better pictures (and nearly all do)is to use a
photographer.
If that agent needed a new heating system would you suggest he/she take a course in plumbing and buy some tools..Or are they wiser hiring a plumber?
Do yourselves a huge favor.
Use Pros.
19 February 2010 10:59:02
Not sure if you're a photographer yourself Jeremy, but it's an interesting point.

There are, of course, a lot of people with an eye for design who are able to produce better pictures with a few pro tips.

Not to mention a difficulty in downward pressures on fees making margins ever more important.

I suppose this blog was designed to fit somewhere in the middle of that.

Appreciate the comment though!

Martin
19 February 2010 13:36:14
Hi Martin
Yes, I am an architectural/interior photographer.
A few pro. tips will enable some people to take better pictures, which is great for your holidays, kids etc. But when its pictures of someones most expensive posession? in order to market that posession?
With regard to cost, if an agent starts to use stunning images he/she will soon begin to stand out from the competition, thus attracting more instructions leading to more sales. A professional photographer need not be expensive and will give a high ROI.
As Peter states in his blog. Be the best in your area.
19 February 2010 13:54:04
Do you have a website Jeremy? I'd be interested to see some of your work and you deserve a bit of promotion for your comments!

Martin
19 February 2010 15:48:54
Unfortunatly my website is currently undergoing a complete revamp so nothing to see and most of my work is full of my customers branding. However here are links to two presently live jobs, one very expensive foreign property and one not so expensive UK property. Thanks for the opportunity to show my work I hope you enjoy.
Jeremy

www.see360.co.uk/granville
www.see360.co.uk/pa17
19 February 2010 16:23:39
Very nice indeed, I'll take the sunny one!

It's probably fair to say that both are on (or beyond!) the upper end of the scale for most estate agent portfolios though..

Would it be so easy to justify the expense of a pro photographer for a 3 bed semi?

Martin
19 February 2010 16:50:07
If you ask the guy trying to sell his 3 bed semi
that question his answer will be yes and in my experiance he is more than willing to pay for it. OK he may not require a full blown presentation with video, 360's, bespoke brochure etc. but will greatly benifit from a superb set of well presented stills, which on their own are not costly. Good marketing materisl is only good if it can be tailored to suit the property in question.

Jeremy
19 February 2010 16:59:40
Come on then, you're going to have to define "not costly" now..

Martin
01 May 2010 20:40:50
Interestingly, I was only speaking to one of the large branch networks on Thursday and they mentioned they were potentially going down the professional photographer route. The motor industry uses them for advertising. One slant on it could be to offer a service to train Estate Agents to take their own pictures. I'm sure the Branch Networks would pay for this service as they'll get more viewings as a result. David Gillespie.
04 May 2010 11:55:37
Hi David,

Thanks for the comment. Getting the right level of polish on marketing details is obviously a big part of doing a good sales job. Professional photographers are a cost vs benefit exercise like anything else I suppose - do you have the skills in house or not?

Hope the job website is doing OK - a competitive industry!

Martin
11 May 2010 08:23:32
I think one of the main important facts is to invest in a very good digital camera, we recently purchased a new samsung wb550 last week and it really does the trick! great quality, "wide angle" and quite chunky so it doesn't look like a disposable camera. Previously we had an average camera but the difference is so noticeable. Somehow i think we're going to rent a few more properties..
13 May 2010 11:34:03
Thanks for the comment - every agent needs a good wide angle lens certainly!

I'm hoping to do a follow-up on kit recommended by a professional at some point.

Martin
26 August 2010 23:58:01
I'll second Jeremy's sentiments [yes I'm a professional property photographer !], for most of us a house sale is the largest financial transaction we will ever make. And the quality of the presentation and marketing can make a big difference in attracting a buyer. Photos are the first thing that buyers take in when browsing, so they should always be first rate.
You asked to define 'not costly', my rates start at £95, I think that's very affordable, even for the marketing of 'normal' properties.

One commenter mentioned that a good camera is important, well you certainly shouldn't be using a bad camera, but knowing how it's used is important too, it's easy to take bad photos with a good camera.
I could buy a good piano, but it wouldn't make me a pianist.
27 August 2010 12:06:01
Thanks for the comment Marcus - a nice portfolio you have there.

Martin
20 February 2011 00:43:22
How interesting. I've long felt like a voice in the wilderness - see http://www.propertyphotographyblog.com/ I've reproduced some articles there that I've written for a national estate agency magazine. I've been training agents to take better photos but I'm finding there's a distinct polarisation between good agents who want to do better, and agents who are poor at property marketing and appear to be oblivious. I'm afraid these are in the majority. It seems that very few agents are aware of the negative impact that poor photography has on their own brand. If you're interested here are my sites - www.doctor-photo.co.uk and www.hello-photo.co.uk and www.propertycreative.com
21 February 2011 10:44:14
This is an interesting concept as good photos make it much easier to sell a good product. Maybe the photographer could do a deal on fees dependant on properties selling? Grant
15 June 2011 14:50:11
High def pics+ nice presentation video= success :D
20 June 2011 21:07:48
Hi there,
Bit late on the ball here, but some really great comments and I loved the photo examples.

I have to take photos in my industry, as I show before and after shots, and I do lousy photos so now wherever possible, I ask a photographer to come in and do them for me. It can cost anything from £100-£200 but it is worth it to use in advertising campaigns amongst other things.

I also noted that he mentioned moving bin bags and signs, etc before taking the shot - being a home stager this is one of my biggest bugbears with agents. It may take a little longer, but you will have such a better photograph if you do this. Washing up on the side, clothes horse in the corner, unmade beds, all things that can be moved and put back if necessary to get a better shot.

Obviously I would recommend getting someone in to dress the house first, but as this isn't always an option, just going that extra mile will reap great rewards for you and your vendor.

Great blog, have only just found it via the linked in message you put, but really enjoying it so far :)

Denise
23 June 2011 08:49:09
Thanks for commenting Denise, I couldn't agree more. Have you got any good examples of where you helped shift 'sticky' properties?

Martin
01 February 2012 13:43:42
Great post, and lots of interesting comments too. Photography is important, but do you ever feel when looking at some property images that the camera lies? We wrote a blog about manipulating images - would love to know your thoughts! http://prsupdate.co.uk/2011/08/23/tech-tuesday-property-images/
01 February 2012 15:51:49
That's a difficult one. I feel a bit uncomfortable about manipulated images to the extent that www.vizzishots.co.uk are doing, but I do like a blue sky - and it does make a difference.
First impressions are important after all.
Using a wide angle lens isn't a case of making rooms look bigger - it's a case of being able to show the whole room.. So that's not easy either.
Misdescriptions still applies to both of course..
Martin